Rotating Wave Approximation
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

The rotating-wave approximation is an approximation used in
atom optics Atom optics (or atomic optics) "refers to techniques to manipulate the trajectories and exploit the wave properties of neutral atoms". Typical experiments employ beams of cold, slowly moving neutral atoms, as a special case of a particle beam. Li ...
and magnetic resonance. In this approximation, terms in a
Hamiltonian Hamiltonian may refer to: * Hamiltonian mechanics, a function that represents the total energy of a system * Hamiltonian (quantum mechanics), an operator corresponding to the total energy of that system ** Dyall Hamiltonian, a modified Hamiltonian ...
that oscillate rapidly are neglected. This is a valid approximation when the applied electromagnetic radiation is near resonance with an atomic transition, and the intensity is low. Explicitly, terms in the Hamiltonians that oscillate with frequencies \omega_L + \omega_0 are neglected, while terms that oscillate with frequencies \omega_L - \omega_0 are kept, where \omega_L is the light frequency, and \omega_0 is a transition frequency. The name of the approximation stems from the form of the Hamiltonian in the
interaction picture In quantum mechanics, the interaction picture (also known as the interaction representation or Dirac picture after Paul Dirac, who introduced it) is an intermediate representation between the Schrödinger picture and the Heisenberg picture. Whe ...
, as shown below. By switching to this picture the evolution of an atom due to the corresponding atomic Hamiltonian is absorbed into the system ket, leaving only the evolution due to the interaction of the atom with the light field to consider. It is in this picture that the rapidly oscillating terms mentioned previously can be neglected. Since in some sense the interaction picture can be thought of as rotating with the system ket only that part of the electromagnetic wave that approximately co-rotates is kept; the counter-rotating component is discarded. The rotating-wave approximation is closely related to, but different from, the secular approximation.


Mathematical formulation

For simplicity consider a two-level atomic system with ground and excited states , \text\rangle and , \text\rangle, respectively (using the Dirac bracket notation). Let the energy difference between the states be \hbar\omega_0 so that \omega_0 is the transition frequency of the system. Then the unperturbed
Hamiltonian Hamiltonian may refer to: * Hamiltonian mechanics, a function that represents the total energy of a system * Hamiltonian (quantum mechanics), an operator corresponding to the total energy of that system ** Dyall Hamiltonian, a modified Hamiltonian ...
of the atom can be written as : H_0 = \frac, \text\rangle\langle\text, -\frac, \text\rangle\langle\text, . Suppose the atom experiences an external classical
electric field An electric field (sometimes called E-field) is a field (physics), physical field that surrounds electrically charged particles such as electrons. In classical electromagnetism, the electric field of a single charge (or group of charges) descri ...
of frequency \omega_L, given by \vec(t) = \vec_0 e^ +\vec_0^* e^; e.g., a
plane wave In physics Physics is the scientific study of matter, its Elementary particle, fundamental constituents, its motion and behavior through space and time, and the related entities of energy and force. "Physical science is that department of ...
propagating in space. Then under the dipole approximation the interaction Hamiltonian between the atom and the electric field can be expressed as : H_1 = -\vec \cdot \vec, where \vec is the dipole moment operator of the atom. The total Hamiltonian for the atom-light system is therefore H = H_0 + H_1. The atom does not have a dipole moment when it is in an energy eigenstate, so \left\langle\text\left, \vec\\text\right\rangle = \left\langle\text\left, \vec\\text\right\rangle = 0. This means that defining \vec_\text \mathrel \left\langle\text\left, \vec\\text\right\rangle allows the dipole operator to be written as : \vec = \vec_\text, \text\rangle\langle\text, + \vec_\text^*, \text\rangle\langle\text, (with ^* denoting the
complex conjugate In mathematics, the complex conjugate of a complex number is the number with an equal real part and an imaginary part equal in magnitude but opposite in sign. That is, if a and b are real numbers, then the complex conjugate of a + bi is a - ...
). The interaction Hamiltonian can then be shown to be : H_1 = -\hbar\left(\Omega e^ + \tildee^\right), \text\rangle\langle\text, -\hbar\left(\tilde^* e^ + \Omega^*e^\right), \text\rangle\langle\text, where \Omega = \hbar^\vec_\text \cdot \vec_0 is the Rabi frequency and \tilde \mathrel \hbar^\vec_\text \cdot \vec_0^* is the counter-rotating frequency. To see why the \tilde terms are called ''counter-rotating'' consider a
unitary transformation In mathematics, a unitary transformation is a linear isomorphism that preserves the inner product: the inner product of two vectors before the transformation is equal to their inner product after the transformation. Formal definition More precise ...
to the interaction or Dirac picture where the transformed Hamiltonian H_ is given by : H_ = -\hbar\left(\Omega e^ + \tildee^\right), \text\rangle\langle\text, -\hbar\left(\tilde^* e^ + \Omega^* e^\right), \text\rangle\langle\text, , where \Delta \omega \mathrel \omega_L - \omega_0 is the detuning between the light field and the atom.


Making the approximation

This is the point at which the rotating wave approximation is made. The dipole approximation has been assumed, and for this to remain valid the electric field must be near
resonance Resonance is a phenomenon that occurs when an object or system is subjected to an external force or vibration whose frequency matches a resonant frequency (or resonance frequency) of the system, defined as a frequency that generates a maximu ...
with the atomic transition. This means that \Delta \omega \ll \omega_L + \omega_0 and the complex exponentials multiplying \tilde and \tilde^* can be considered to be rapidly oscillating. Hence on any appreciable time scale, the oscillations will quickly average to 0. The rotating wave approximation is thus the claim that these terms may be neglected and thus the Hamiltonian can be written in the interaction picture as : H_^ = -\hbar\Omega e^, \text\rangle\langle\text, -\hbar\Omega^* e^, \text\rangle\langle\text, . Finally, transforming back into the
Schrödinger picture In physics, the Schrödinger picture or Schrödinger representation is a formulation of quantum mechanics in which the state vectors evolve in time, but the operators (observables and others) are mostly constant with respect to time (an exceptio ...
, the Hamiltonian is given by :H^\text = \frac, \text\rangle\langle\text, - \frac, \text\rangle\langle\text, - \hbar\Omega e^, \text\rangle\langle\text, - \hbar\Omega^* e^, \text\rangle\langle\text, . Another criterion for rotating wave approximation is the weak coupling condition, that is, the Rabi frequency should be much less than the transition frequency. At this point the rotating wave approximation is complete. A common first step beyond this is to remove the remaining time dependence in the Hamiltonian via another unitary transformation.


Derivation

Given the above definitions the interaction Hamiltonian is : \begin H_1 = -\vec\cdot\vec &= -\left(\vec_\text, \text\rangle\langle\text, + \vec_\text^*, \text\rangle\langle\text, \right) \cdot \left(\vec_0 e^ + \vec_0^* e^\right) \\ &= -\left(\vec_\text \cdot \vec_0 e^ +\vec_\text \cdot \vec_0^* e^\right), \text\rangle\langle\text, -\left(\vec_\text^* \cdot \vec_0 e^ +\vec_\text^* \cdot \vec_0^* e^\right), \text\rangle\langle\text, \\ &= -\hbar\left(\Omega e^ + \tilde e^\right), \text\rangle\langle\text, -\hbar\left(\tilde^* e^ + \Omega^* e^\right), \text\rangle\langle\text, , \end as stated. The next step is to find the Hamiltonian in the
interaction picture In quantum mechanics, the interaction picture (also known as the interaction representation or Dirac picture after Paul Dirac, who introduced it) is an intermediate representation between the Schrödinger picture and the Heisenberg picture. Whe ...
, H_. The required unitary transformation is : \beginU & = e^ \\ & = e^ \\ & = \cos(\frac)\left(, \text\rangle \langle\text, + , \text\rangle \langle\text, \right) + i \sin(\frac) \left(, \text\rangle \langle\text, - , \text\rangle \langle\text, \right) \\ & = e^, \text\rangle \langle\text, + e^ , \text\rangle \langle\text, \\ & = e^\left(, \text\rangle \langle\text, + e^ , \text\rangle \langle\text, \right) \end, where the 3rd step can be proved by using a
Taylor series In mathematics, the Taylor series or Taylor expansion of a function is an infinite sum of terms that are expressed in terms of the function's derivatives at a single point. For most common functions, the function and the sum of its Taylor ser ...
expansion, and using the orthogonality of the states , \text\rangle and , \text\rangle. Note that a multiplication by an overall phase of e^ on a unitary operator does not affect the underlying physics, so in the further usages of U we will neglect it. Applying U gives: : \begin H_ &\equiv U H_1 U^\dagger \\ &= -\hbar\left(\Omega e^ + \tildee^\right)e^, \text\rangle\langle\text, -\hbar\left(\tilde^* e^ + \Omega^*e^\right), \text\rangle\langle\text, e^ \\ &= -\hbar\left(\Omega e^ + \tildee^\right), \text\rangle\langle\text, -\hbar\left(\tilde^*e^ + \Omega^* e^\right), \text\rangle\langle\text, \ . \end Now we apply the RWA by eliminating the counter-rotating terms as explained in the previous section: : H_^ = -\hbar\Omega e^, \text\rangle\langle\text, + -\hbar\Omega^* e^, \text\rangle\langle\text, Finally, we transform the approximate Hamiltonian H_^ back to the Schrödinger picture: : \begin H_1^\text &= U^\dagger H_^ U \\ &= -\hbar\Omega e^e^, \text\rangle\langle\text, -\hbar\Omega^* e^, \text\rangle\langle\text, e^ \\ &= -\hbar\Omega e^, \text\rangle\langle\text, -\hbar\Omega^* e^, \text\rangle\langle\text, . \end The atomic Hamiltonian was unaffected by the approximation, so the total Hamiltonian in the Schrödinger picture under the rotating wave approximation is : H^\text = H_0 + H_1^\text = \frac, \text\rangle\langle\text, - \frac, \text\rangle\langle\text, - \hbar\Omega e^, \text\rangle\langle\text, - \hbar\Omega^*e^, \text\rangle\langle\text, .


References

{{DEFAULTSORT:Rotating Wave Approximation Atomic, molecular, and optical physics Chemical physics